What would you like to do?
Barring the media from reporting about ongoing criminal trials would violate which Constitutional Amendment?
1 personfound this useful
Was this answer useful?
Thanks for the feedback!
what is reasonable doubt
First amendment- freedom of press
Protection from the Federal Government
the Salem Witch trails took place in 1692 and the first amendment was adopted December 15, 1791 so they could not be violating the first amendment. EDIT: If the amendment had… existed, it would not have been violated. The victims were arrested on evidence the government declared viable, they were given a fair civil trial and convicted on a charge that was legal in Puritan Massachusetts.
A US DIstrict Court.
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable search and seizure. While this doesn't pertain specifically to trials, it governs what evidence may be admitted at …trial and used to convict the person accused. Evidence obtained unlawfully is excluded from consideration, as is any evidence stemming from the unlawfully obtained evidence ("The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree"). The Fifth Amendment requires that capital cases (those which can bring a sentence of death on conviction) be brought before a grand jury for indictment before going to trial. This is a control over the power of the prosecutor to bring charges without review. The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from having to give testimony or other evidence that might be used to convict them. This protection is often misunderstood. If a defendant (the person charged with the crime) decides to testify at trial, he is compelled to answer questions from the prosecutor during cross-examination, even if the answers might be incriminating. If the defendant wishes to avoid answering those questions, he can refuse to testify at all. The Fifth Amendment also protects the right to due process. In order to impose a penalty on a person who has committed a crime, the state must follow all the rules and procedures. For instance, if the state had evidence that would tend to prove the innocence of an accused person, and did not reveal the existence of this evidence to the accused, the accused would be denied due process. The Sixth Amendment guarantes the right to a "speedy and public trial." This means that the state must commence trial proceedings within a span of time determined by local court rules. If the defendant requests a continuance or otherwise delays the start of the trial, the right to a spedy trial is waived and no longer applies. The right to a public trial ensures against "Star Chamber" secret proceedings that can be used to violate the accused's rights. The Sixth Amendment further guarantees that the court will have jurisdiction over the charge brought against the defendant (e.g. a court in California has no jurisdiction over a crime committed in Oregon), and that the accused has the right to cross-examine any witnesses that testify against him. It also guarantees that the defendant has the power of the subpoena to bring witnsses for his defense to court. A subpoena compels a witness' attendance to court, even if they don't want to come, and forces them to testify (although they can't be compelled to give testimony that would incriminate them). Finally, the Sixth Amendment ensures that the accused has the assistance of an attorney in defending himself. This right has been clarified to apply only when the accused is in jeopardy of imprisonment, should he be convicted. There is no right to have an attorney whose services are paid for by the government in minor crimes such as traffic offenses and shoplifting, unless the state states an intent to seek jail time on conviction. The Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution gives every person the right to refuse to incriminate himself. (This is often called 'taking the fifth.') Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment gives all citizens protection from states and local governments removing their constitution rights. Further, it gives all people (not just citizens) the right to maintain life, liberty and property except with due process of law. This means that states can't take away your right to freedom of speech or the right to bear arms without a trial. The state can't put you in prison or take your home without a trial.
Not sure exactly what you mean. Handguns don't violate any amendment. Firearm ownership in general is protected by the second amendment.
There are a number of options available to the court. Initially, both the prosecution and the defense is given the opportunity to voir dire potential jurors, in an effort …to keep people that have heard media coverage about the case from being on the jury. If it is a locally publicized case, the case may be transferred to a different location, where jurors will be less likely to have heard media info. . Next, if there is ongoing media coverage, both sides can ask the court to sequester the jury, or keep them in a closed location and unable to be exposed to media. . Sometimes the media is prevented or limited from being in the courtroom during trial. Often cameras are prohibited from courtrooms. .
The term is a reference to a particular case (in this instance a State of California case (People v. Sesslin (1968) 68 Cal.2 nd 418) which sets forth what must be contain…ed in an affidavit for a warrant (i..e.: 'Probable Cause'), when a warrant is applied for by law enforcement. In common everyday law enforcement usage, simply the term "warrant affidavit" is more commonly used, dropping the specific reference to Sesslin. To answer the question , if the case is, in fact, ongoing, it would APPEAR that the prosecution believes that PC exists to uncover further evidence, (or arrest further individuals) in relation to the ongoing case.
violation of the 5th amendment due process of law
What amendment to the us constitution is concerned with the criminal defendants rights to a jury trial?
It was not. The fourth amendment did not go into effect until December of 1791. The Salem witch hysteria occured in 1692. The fourth amendment, the constitution and the United… States of America all didn't exist in 1692.
Type your answer here... The First Amendment provides the right to the press. The Sixth Amendment gives the right to a speedy and public trial in criminal matters. With the…se two amendments, the press has the right to attend public criminal proceedings.
The thirteenth amendment
Who would advocate to seek justice in a criminal matter where the defendant's rights were violated during the trial?
This question could have many different answers, but "Civil RightsAttorney" would probably be the most specific. In reality, it's the responsibility of all court officers top…rotect the rights of all individuals involved in a legal matter.If an individual's rights are violated during trial, the appellatecourts are delegated the task of correcting the error.