Impeachment of president?
It means a trial of wrongdoings by the president. The senate and house vote to get president out of office before his term is up.
5 peoplefound this useful
He tried to fire the secretary of war, Edwin stanton, in violation of the tenure of office act.
Andrew Johnson had a very contentious relationship with a RadicalRepublican Congress. He was charged with not following properprocedure by violating the Tenure of Office Act, …when he firedEdwin Stanton, the Secretary of War. This became of the firstimpeachment of an American president.
He wasn't impeached. Jackson completed two terms in office. You're thinking of Andrew Johnson, the 17th President.
Congress passed the Tenure ofOffice Act to prevent President Johnson from removing several topofficers in his administration. The law provided that any personholding an office… by presidential appointment with Senate consentshould remain in that office until a successor had been confirmedby the Senate. The President vetoed the bill, but the veto wasoverridden. He fired Stanton anyway. That sparked Johnson'simpeachment.
Clinton's impeachment by the House and trial in the Senate showedhow the legislative branch can be called upon to check the power othe executive branch.
give it a few more bows to other kings and dictators, Castro and Kim-Dun-Poo
The most direct charge against Johnson was his violation of the Tenure of Office act which required him to get approval from Congress to fire cabinet members. He fired Secreta…ry of War Stanton without approval. He argued that the president had a right to choose his cabinet . (Stanton was appointed by Lincoln.)
He was cheating on his wife with a white house lady. He lied under oath and no one liked him anymore.
President Andrew Johnson was primarily impeached for violating the 1867 Tenure of Office Act. Some of the other charges included violating the Command of the Army Act and libe…ling Congress with "inflammatory and scandalous harangues." Explanation The Tenure of Office Act prohibited the President from firing any official who had been placed in office with the "advice and consent" of the Senate unless the Senate also approved the removal. President Johnson wanted to replace Secretary of War, Edwin M. Stanton, whom Lincoln had appointed Secretary of War in 1862. Stanton had informed the President that the military chain of command had been changed, and that the Southern military leaders would henceforth answer only to Congress, and not the President. In August 1867, Johnson responded by attempting to fire Stanton and replace him with Ulysses S. Grant, but the Senate supported Stanton and refused to confirm Grant's appointment and reinstated Stanton against the President's wishes. In February 1868, Johnson appointed Lorenzo Thomas as the new Secretary of War and ordered the Southern military leaders to report directly to him. Stanton refused to step down, instead barricading himself in his office where he lived for three days until the House of Representatives brought eleven Articles of impeachment against Andrew Johnson for "high crimes and misdemeanors," among them violating the Tenure of Office Act in defiance of the Senate. Johnson was impeached by a vote of 126-47 on February 24, 1868, but was acquitted by a single vote (35-19) at the conclusion of his Senate removal trial on May 16, 1868. Johnson completed his Presidential term and left office March 4, 1869. He was succeeded by Ulysses S. Grant.
Multiple-choice questions only work when the choices are actually listed. Try again.
On August 12, 1867, Johnson suspended Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton and named General Ulysses S. Grant to replace him.
The House voted to impeach and the Senate held the necessary trial and failed to convict by votes of 45 for to 55 against on the perjury charge and 50-50 on the obstruction of… justice charge. 67 votes would be required to convict.
Can declare executive actions unconstitutional Power to issue warrants Chief justice presides over impeachment of president?
No, not unless that citizen is a member of congress. Throughout\nhistory, controversial decisions by presidents have led certain members\nof the public to call for impeachmen…t. But this can only occur through\na procedure that comes from congress, so if citizens feel strongly that a \npresident deserves to be impeached (not because they dislike his policies\nbut because they believe he has broken the law), these citizens should contact their members of\ncongress and express their reasons why they believe the president deserves impeachment. \n\n\n. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
It fell apart when people realised Clinton had been technically truthful. And considering it was a sex scandal, questions asked under oath were poorly worded and the "ACT" com…mitted was not included as a sexual act in the question provided to the President. Watching on the new: it was both hilarious and a Farce. In the end Clinton showed he was smarter and "quicker on his feet" than those trying to impeach him. Still don't know why Hillary didn't dump him though.
He was acquitted